subject
Biology, 01.12.2020 16:40 christiancase06

If a scientist wants to figure out how old a rock layer is, would it be useful to use a substance that takes a long time to break down (has a long half life), or a substance that breaks down quickly? is it A. A substance that breaks down slowly, because then there won't be enough left to measure

B. A substance that breaks down slowly, because then there will be enough left to measure.

C. A substance that breaks down quickly, so it will be all gone and we'll know it's old

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Biology

question
Biology, 21.06.2019 18:30
The gene that causes sickle-cell disease is present in a higher percentage of residents of sub-saharan africa than among those of african descent living in the united states. even though this gene causes sickle-cell disease, it also provides some protection from malaria, a serious disease that is widespread in sub-saharan africa but absent in the united states. discuss an evolutionary process that could account for the different percentages of the sickle-cell gene among residents of the two regions.
Answers: 3
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 12:00
Matched chromosomes carrying information about the same characteristics in the organism are called
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 13:00
Describe the impact of deforestation of both abiotic and biotic factors within the tropical rainforest.
Answers: 2
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 13:20
Aragonite shells of clams, snails, or scleractinian corals may be preserved unaltered in cenozoic deposits, but they are generally dissolved or recrystallized in older deposits. true or false
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
If a scientist wants to figure out how old a rock layer is, would it be useful to use a substance th...
Questions
question
World Languages, 14.11.2019 16:31
question
Mathematics, 14.11.2019 16:31
question
English, 14.11.2019 16:31