Explain why just protecting a species like the grizzly bear with a law may not be enough to conserve this species?

When laws are made to protect a species, it is made to stop human interference. Often natural factors also are the reason for a species decline, some of these factors may include, habitat change, climate change and may also be a disease going through the species. In order to truly save a species you would have to isolate them in an area and make sure they are all healthy and the habitat does not change. The only issue with that is, they could lose some of their natural instincts such as hunting or being scared of humans. So a law may not be enough to save a species because there may also be many natural factors interfering with a species survival.

Explanation:

i'd say that the moon rock is about 2.2 billion years old.