One argument in response to the "Commons" idea is that private land ownership will prevent a "tragedy" from happening. Based on the article, do you agree or disagree? Why?

agree

Explanation:

The common argument which is based on shared assets and the behavior of each individuals.

When the land ownership becomes private a tragedy is avoided as each individual treats the land with care and caution, unlike when it’s a common( shared) where they all don’t care what happens to the land or it’s aftermath so far they all gain personally. So yes when it’s a private land then and then do they truly prevent any tragedy associated with common to happen.

1: most common garden plants prefer loam — soils with a balance of different-sized mineral particles (approximately 40% sand, 40% silt, and 20% clay) with ample organic matter and pore space. however, some plants grow better in sandy soils, while others are well-adapted to clay soils.

2: available water capacity is the maximum amount of plant available water a soil can provide. it is an indicator of a soil's ability to retain water and make it sufficiently available for plant use. available water capacity is the water held in soil between its field capacity and permanent wilting point.

3: it is the same for all living things (plants and animals). it also includes very tiny organisms that our eyes cannot see. they are known as microorganisms, and include viruses, bacteria and fungi.