A scientist is unsure about the accuracy of her experiment. She has checked her equipment and found it to be in good working order, checked her data and found it to be accurate, and reviewed her interpretation of the data, which she found to be logical. What should she do in addition to check the accuracy of her results?

The answer to the question above is given below

Explanation:

Since the scientist is unsure about the accuracy of her experiment, it could be possible the procedure she used was reliable but the result inaccurate or the procedure can also be inaccurate and also the result. She checked her equipment, data, and even the interpretation of the data and found all to be correct. But it wasn't mentioned if she repeated the experiment.

The following points will briefly highlight other possible ways to further check the accuracy of her results:

1. The accuracy of an experiment could also question how reliable it is. She should repeat the experiment over and over again without changing any parameter she used initially to test if she gets the same result. Similar results would imply an accurate experiment.

2. She should check if an experiment has been done before by another scientist on the same subject, check parameters used and compare values and results. This in other words is checking if the hypothesis is true.

3. She should check for random errors that could arise from environmental conditions that could influence her final result.

answer; a muscle cell, another neuron and a of the above

the answer is c most of the fortnite players usually buy v bucks to get the battle pass and other cosmetics but some players who are referred to as "no skins" don't   buy skins and are usually noobs.