Chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) have been used in refrigeration for decades. They have low boiling points, nonflammable, chemically stable, and odorless. These properties make CFCs ideal for refrigeration. The problem is CFC compounds have been determined to break apart ozone in the stratosphere, allowing more UV radiation to reach the surface. Alternatives have been developed to help take the place of these CFCs such as HCFCs and HFCs. What property of HCFCs and HFCs make them viable alternatives to CFCs? A) they have shorter lifetimes B) they do not destroy any ozone C) less expensive to produce than CFCs D) they possibly contribute to global warming

the cell theory states that all living things including animals, as well as plants, are made of cells.

1. dermis

2. chemical

3. urine

4. viruses

5. antibodies

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."

no moderator inbox me? ?