A scientist conducting an experiment quickly saw that she was not getting the results she expected. Instead of continuing to collect data, she went back to redesign the experiment until the data came out the way that the hypothesis predicted. The scientist’s work did not follow the scientific method. Which statement best explains why? She followed the steps of the scientific method, but in the wrong order.
She made improvements to her experimental design rather than keeping it the same.
She failed to look at the data objectively by trying to get a desired result.
She carried out multiple trials rather than carrying out one trial correctly.

The first answer. The scientist should learn from her mistakes and try to prevent them from happening in the future.

First option - She followed the steps of the scientific method, but in the wrong order.

Explanation:

The scientist probably did not even follow the scientific method the right way. She might've skipped something.

bc blah

explanation:

bc blah

succession returns a disturbed

ecosystem to a more stable state. this is also classified into two (2) types:

primary succession and secondary succession. the primary succession arises when

a new land is transformed and a bare rock has been exposed providing an environment

that can be occupied for the first time. while, secondary succession occurs

when a previously occupied environment was disturbed that kills much of all its

community

explanation: