subject
Biology, 14.07.2020 20:01 josephbig9

A population of shrimp suddenly starts collapsing. A biologist believes that toxins in the food chain are interfering with larvae development. A climate scientist believes that a change in water temperature is depleting food sources from the water. Why are both of these options valid scientific hypothesis? A. Scientists with different educational can come to different interpretations of the same data. B. No educated guess can be considered a valid hypothesis since hypotheses are made before data collection. C. Scientific debate is always continuing and the scientific community never discards a hypothesis. D. Both scientists underwent the same training and, therefore, have equally valid hypotheses.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Biology

question
Biology, 22.06.2019 16:40
During dna replication,each strand of dna is used as a template to produce a complementary strand of dna. this process is shown below. which base will attach to location
Answers: 3
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 17:00
The open ocean of any depth is called the
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 17:50
The graph shows how much money the south dakota livestock industry earns annually. according to the graph, which industry would experience the greatest financial impact from a loss of pastureland
Answers: 3
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 19:10
Which statement does lola need to correct, and why? a) statement 1 because spiral galaxies do not havearmsb) statement 2 because the bulges contain mostlyyoung red stars.c) statement 3 because the arms are made of mostlyyoung blue and blue-white stars.d) statement 4 because spirals galaxies contain littleto no dust.(c)
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
A population of shrimp suddenly starts collapsing. A biologist believes that toxins in the food chai...
Questions