You may see a lot of brain imaging studies in the news or on the Internet. Thinking back to the research methods discussed in Chapter One (Learning Objectives 1.6 through 1.11), what kinds of questions should you ask about these studies before accepting the findings as valid?

Before accepting brain imaging studies, the inquiries that I would pose before believing these discoveries to be legitimate are:  

Did the investigation show up in a peer-reviewed journal?  

peer-reviewed implies presenting the exploration papers to different specialists for an alternate and free audit before accepting it. It is perhaps the most ideal way of finding out the reality of the study and how right the outcomes are. It is in every case great to go for the subsequent feeling.  

How large was the sample?  

Clearly more the members in an examination, progressively substantial are its outcomes. This is to learn that there were a serious measure of individuals whose brain were examined.  

Did the scientists control for key contrasts?  

Assorted variety or sex parity ought to be there while contemplating the examples. One shows signs of improvement result when the investigation of populace is as homogenous as conceivable in light of the fact that it permits the specialists to reduce or diminish the quantity of contrasts that may influence the examination or result.

the answer is false?