Overall, do you think the Chernobyl accident has actually been ecologically beneficial for the ecosystems within the exclusion zone? Which do you think is more damaging or dangerous to the biodiversity – the contamination from the radioactive fallout, or the presence of a large human population? Justify your answer.

After the accident, radioactive materials were deposited mostly on open surfaces such as lawns, parks, roads, and building roofs, for instance by contaminated rain. Since then, the surface contamination in urban areas has decreased because of the effects of wind, rain, traffic, street washing and cleanup.

Explanation:

goog may have it for you

what's the question ?