Scientists are currently spending time and resources studying prokaryotes that are found in extreme and remote environments. Should scientists be focusing on prokaryotes that are more apparently relevant to humans, such as those that may cause disease? Why or Why not? Based upon what you learned in this module about the domains Bacteria and Archaea, in what possible ways could a better understanding of prokaryotes that live in remote or extreme environments possibly be beneficial to humans?
Answers: 3
Another question on Biology
Biology, 22.06.2019 10:00
How do plants obtain more sunlight a.) they lean towards the light b.)they grow straight up c.) they only live in sunny areas, like the tropics d.) they stay low to the ground
Answers: 2
Biology, 22.06.2019 11:00
What is the best conclusion based on this data? the hypothesis was not supported because the data indicated that fertilizing plants does not improve plant growth. the hypothesis was supported; to get the best growth, use 5 milliliters of fertilizer per plant. the hypothesis was not supported; the data indicated that too much fertilizer can inhibit plant growth. the hypothesis was supported; to get the best growth, use 15 milliliters of fertilizer per plant.
Answers: 2
Biology, 22.06.2019 16:30
In what ways does the study of human population differ from the study of wildlife ecology
Answers: 1
Biology, 22.06.2019 16:30
Why do mountaineers become breathless as they reach high altitudes
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Scientists are currently spending time and resources studying prokaryotes that are found in extreme...
Questions
Health, 01.10.2019 19:20
History, 01.10.2019 19:20
Biology, 01.10.2019 19:20
History, 01.10.2019 19:20
English, 01.10.2019 19:20
Mathematics, 01.10.2019 19:20
