If someone doesn't believe in global warming because they have been monitoring the temperatures through a local weather station and the temperatures has stayed steady or the past few years how would I develop an argument to convince the person that their evidence does not mean global warming does not exist

The major argument is the identification of a climate related phenomenon on basis of weather data of a local region.

Explanation:

The major difference is regarding the difference between the basic definitions of the term weather and climate. The observations made by the protagonist are constrained both by the location as well as the time duration. Where as the global warming is linked to climate of the planet and these observations are to be general inclusive of all the regions across the globe as well as comparative historical data for large amount may be decades.

answer : haversian

[explanation: -(compact bone is organized as parallel columns, known as haversian systems, which run lengthwise down the axis of long bones. these columns are composed of lamellae, concentric rings of bone, surrounding a central channel, or haversian canal, that contains the nerves, blood vessels, and lymphatic system of the bone)]

population. population is the number of people or animals in a particular place. an example of population is over eight million people living in new york city.

here is your answer hope i .