A research company uses a device to record the viewing habits of about 12 comma 50012,500 households, and the data collected over the next 2 yearsover the next 2 years will be used to determinenbsp whether nbsp whether the proportion of households tuned to a particular sportssports programnbsp decreases.

cross-sectional study

Explanation:

A cross-sectional study is an observational research that has to do with data analysis of variables or sane set of variable obtained at a particular point of time (a snap shot)across a sample population. It is also called cross-sectional analysis, transverse study or prevalence study.

In this study type, the variable is said to be constant. It can either be a descriptive (to show the frequency and distribution of the study topic in a particular area) cross-sectional study or an anakytical cross-sectional study (to show the relationship between two related or unrelated variables).

As in this case study, if a significant amount of the population view a particular sport program more than the others, the researcher can conduct further studies to understand the reason behind the variation in populations that viewed a particular sport program – like a longitudinal study.  

In a cross-sectional study, to determine the prevalence, multiple parameters are estimated simultaneously – questions, observations, and answers. Prevalence = amount of cases at a certain period in time / population of people at that certain period.

The cross-sectional studies is swift to perform, variblels are retrieve once, help determine different outcomes with the prevalence value too, can be used for descriptive analysis and to promote further research.

from almost the creation of the first true maps of the earth, people started seeing how continents would be able to fit together.   in particular, people noticed that south america fits almost exactly into africa.

you should be aware that while world maps were around early in the 1600’s and better defined by the end of the 1700’s, those maps were not ‘public’ but were treated as state secrets.   and so it was not till much later that the broader ‘science’ community had access to good quality and accurate world maps.

get the whole story here…

it is now known that most of the major continental masses can be fit together in a jigsaw process.   in fact we now know that the continents were indeed once all joined together as one land mass – the supercontinent of pangaea.

if you look at most world maps you will ponder how this is evidence, as the continents really don’t appear to ‘fit’ together very well.   what you need to understand is that the vast majority of maps are drawn using a map projection that has the north and south poles (which are points) are a line the width of the map at the top and bottom.   this means that the map distorts the true shape of the earth’s land and oceans as you love closer to the poles.     some other map projections distort less, but have the map shape looking like segments of an orange.   see here for a range of map projections.   check out the way greenland changes size in each!

what is more remarkable, is the next piece of evidence when added to the shape of continents.

location of mountains and fossils

what is remarkable, when you reassemble all the continents together, the ancient mountain ranges (many now eroded to their cores) and the location of rock types and fossils all match up.

what's the rest of the question