California enacts a statute to ban advertising in "bad taste." this stat-ute would likely be held by a court to be

(a) anunconstitutional restriction of speech.
(b) constitutional under the first amendment.
(c) justified by the need to protect individual rights.
(d)necessary to protect national interests

Option A, an unconstitutional restriction of speech

Explanation:

Please see the attachment

you didn't give any options but heres what i can tell you: an inference is likely to change based on additional observations. the latter is something that you have seen or sensed using your sensory organs while the former is like a conclusion out from what you have observed.

cell division is not regulated in tumor cells.