In the following conversation, which group discussion technique does emily
most clearly show?
han:
even though (the author of the article is saying that the
radiation hasn't made japan's exported food dangerous to
eat, he's pulling out all the stops to make it seem as if
japan really messed things up, even though there's proof
the disaster couldn't be prevented.
emily:
so you think the theme isn't really about the contamination,
but about how japan can't prevent natural disasters from
destroying the reactors?
a. challenging established ideas
o
b. assessing the claims of your discussion partner
o
c. using evidence to support your conclusions
o
d. using parallel structure and audience appeals

Option B, Assessing the claims of your discussion partner

Explanation:

Emily has asked the discussion partner a question that raise doubts on their statements on one hand and on the other hand shows the interpersonal skill of Emily to analyse the facts and figures.

She has tried to get the answer of her doubts from her discussion partner itself without any direct contradicting or questioning.

Option B is correct

answer : haversian

[explanation: -(compact bone is organized as parallel columns, known as haversian systems, which run lengthwise down the axis of long bones. these columns are composed of lamellae, concentric rings of bone, surrounding a central channel, or haversian canal, that contains the nerves, blood vessels, and lymphatic system of the bone)]