Ascientific claim can seem valid if it is supported by a controlled experiment and multiple trials. which factor could make the claim invalid? if it is posted in a scientific journal if it is made by an expert in the field if it benefits a company's profits if it is accepted through a peer review

if it benefits a company's profits

Explanation:

✅ A scientific claim is the statement which is based on the evidences based on the experimental trials. The statement is baised and incorrect it will be considered as invalid.

✅ If it benefits a company profits is the correct option. As the claim can be invalid and biased.

IamSugarBee

im not in connections yet but i might can you some questions. what grade are you in?

that would be called plucking : )

explanation:

''plucking, also referred to as quarrying, is a glacial phenomenon that is responsible for the erosion and transportation of individual pieces of bedrock, especially large "joint blocks". as a glacier moves down a valley, friction causes the basal ice of the glacier to melt and infiltrate joints (cracks) in the bedrock."