Which of the following best explains what would happen if there were no autotrophs in an ecosystem? (1 point) they are the first trophic level in an ecosystem and without them the rest of the organisms in the ecosystem would have no source of energy. they are the top trophic level in an ecosystem and without them the herbivores would have to adapt to consuming other heterotrophs for energy. they are the first trophic level in an ecosystem and without them heterotrophs would overpopulate. they are the top trophic level in an ecosystem and without them the ecosystem would collapse.

They are the first trophic level in an ecosystem and without them the rest of the organisms in the ecosystem would have no source of energy

Explanation:

The autotrophs are the producers in the ecosystem. They manage to produce food for themselves, and they represent the first trophic level, thus they are the basis of any ecosystem. These organisms are the once that produce the energy, and the organisms in the trophic levels above them use their energy to survive. If the autotrophs are removed from and ecosystem, the ecosystem will collapse, as there will be no source of energy for the organisms in the trophic levels above, thus all of them will die out quickly.

every el niño cycle is different. every year.

hi my name is ashlynn and im 15

these macromolecules could either be amino acids, proteins or nucleic acids. they are responsible for the chemical changes and reactions that affects largely the cell and its composition. take for instance the cytoplasm of the cell where these organelles are settled. these simple organelles are composed of macromolecules which ignites and catalyses different functions that enables cells, in macro-perspective in motion and metabolism. in intestines for example, metabolism happens and breaking down parts of a food to simpler compounds that are used and these nutrients delivered throughout the body and again broken down by into smaller components.