1) what does newton’s law of universal gravitation say about the distance between objects?

2) how does a free-body diagram tell you about the net force on an object?

3) stone has a mass of 100 grams and a volume of 10 ml. water has a density of 1 g/ml. will the stone float or sink?

4) how does archimedes' principle explain how much fluid is displaced by an object?

5) what does hooke's law say about the relationship of spring to the force applied to it?

6) how can you increase the momentum of an object?

7) when is a collision considered inelastic?

8) a satellite traveling 1,000 m/s approaches a second satellite that is at rest. they both have the same mass. what will happen to their speeds when they connect and move off together?

you don't have to answer all of them just try and answer as many as you can it would be a big ^^

Sorry These Are Out Of Order

"6" if you increase either mass or velocity the momentum of an object increases proportionally if you double the mass or velocity you double the momentum

"5" that it will turn to its original shape after it is let free of the force hope this helps

"4"  Archimede's principle states that a body immersed in a fluid is buoyed up by a force (buoyant force) equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the body.

So If I place a 5 oz rock into a glass of water, and 5 oz of water is displaced, the rock therefore weighs 5 oz

"3" To find if the stone will sink, we have to find out the density of the stone.

Density = mass/volume = 100g/10ml = 10g/ml

To stone will sink because it has a higher density.

"2" a free-body diagram shows the vectors for all the force acting on the body the resultant vector found by summing all the individual vectors represents the net force.

"8"

The formula for computing the final speed of a perfectly inelastic collision is

m1V1 + m2V2 = (m1 + m2)Vf

in this case the mass are equal so 

m1V1 + m1V2 = (m1 + m1)Vf

m1(V1+V2) = 2(m1)Vf

 thus

(m1(1000 + 0)) / 2m1 = Vf 

Vf = 500 m/s

Hope my answer would be a great help for you.    

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."

b 04545