What is your opinion of the balance of nature hypothesis? would deer on the island be better off, worse off, or about the same without the wolves? defend your position
answer→ (full 3 paragraphs to answer)

I think they would be worse of without wolves because wolves act as a natural selective pressure which favors the survival of the strongest deers. The second thing is that without a natural predator, the deer would probably reproduce in vast numbers which would reduce the amount of resources available for all deer on an island. It would eventually lead to their decay.

My deepest apology that it is not 3 paragraphs. I recommend to add more and state your opinion more clearly. That’s all

answer; bodies of water store heat during the day and release it at

hey bro i looked it up on google the structure of the eye-spot in euglena viridie, e. ehrenbergii, and phacus pyriyorme is not as franzé haa described it. the so-called “crystal body” and “lens bodies” were not found in any of the individuals of the species examined by me. as earlier observers have stated, the eye-spot consists simply of a mass of pigment granules arranged in a single layer, and probably embedded in a protoplasmic framework, but the latter could not be seen, and its presence was only inferred from the fact that the pigment granules must be held together in some way, thd the eye-spot as a whole is capable of expansion, and that the pigment granules can be separated from each other.

hope this   and an i get brainlsiest