Explain briefly how the nazca decorated their pots compared to how the moche did it.
idk

They did it with much colors.

Explanation:

Nazca pottery is decorated and based on strong colors while Moche pottery isn't, they are using fewer colors.

Images of Nazca pottery are referring eyes that are staring, gods, faces od people, creatures such as mythical ones and animals, for example, lizards or monkeys.

Moche pottery was also showing animals and people but with less color and they were using a very light background, usually white or light beige with red decoration. They were also having animals such as monkeys and birds but they are always being hybridized or very realistically represented. There are also more animals such as foxes and deers.

Firstly, Nazca pottery is characterized by strong colors. The images shown on Nazca pottery are staring eyes, unspecified gods and people (often just a face); in addition, animals and creatures such as lizards, monkeys, birds, whales and mythical ones are often shown. They were very innovative with the form as well.

Moche pottery also showcased both people and animals. Compared to the Nazca pottery, Moche made their much less colorful. There's usually a cream or white background with red decoration. Their human representations usually have some supernatural features while the animals (birds, fish, feline, reptiles, deer, foxes, monkeys etc.) are both represented realistically or hybridized.

Explanation:

romare bearden worked with many types of media which includes cartoons, oils and collages. basically, the use of collage him create emotionally affecting images hence back then he had struggled with his two artistic sides as a student of literature and of artistic traditions and being a black human being which involves very real experiences, fugrative and concrete.thus through the use of collage expressed or showed how his art/work became more representational and more overtly socially concious. he showed how not only were african-american rights moving forward but so was his socially concious art and by then his works became generally considered as best works in 1964.