Do you think that lincoln measures to deal with disloyalty and dissent represented an abuse of power?

According to my interpretation, Lincoln's action to suspend Habeas Corpus in 1863 clearly constitutes an abuse of power. Although this measure can be justified through the clear situation of danger represented by the Civil War, the truth is that the President suspended a constitutional guarantee and a right of all citizens without having the authority to do so, thereby taking that measure constituted an abuse of his power and political position, as determined by the Constitution.

the answer to this question is false