Which of the following proofs for the existence of god is a form of "begging the question" fallacy-circular argument?

ontological argument

teleological argument

cosmological argument

Technically, both the Ontological and Cosmological argument involve "begging the question"; both routes of thinking involve unjustified assumptions about the state of either the universe (cosmological) or the possibility of god (ontological) in its premise. Typically, conclusions made about a god have a circular contradiction if the flow of logic is separated into steps; coincidentally, the Teleological argument is the only argument posed that did not attempt to provide a stepwise route into the proving of a deity.

Hope this helps!

ek = (m·v2) / 2

v - velocity of system after the collision

m = m1 + m2

ek = (m1 + m2) ·v2/2

ek = (200 + 250) ·2,32/2 = 450·5,29/2 = 1190,25 j